How to ensure reliable mmWave coverage indoors? Model Calibration
Initial deployment of 5G networks at mmWave bands showed promising indications in some aspects while experiencing coverage gaps and dead spots in some scenarios. This cannot be adequately predicted nor quantified without the aid of real field testing to tune coverage simulations to each venue’s specifics or different morphologies.ย
Else, this will lead eventually to either extra infrastructure cost or bad user experience vs. the 5G promise. Model calibration has been the safety net of coverage simulation and hence a standard function in any reliable indoor or outdoor planning software. However, in the mmWave case, it is becoming a more critical step to achieve reliable coverage and decent KPI’s.ย
Propagation studies of sub-6 GHz bands are quite mature. However, less knowledge has been obtained yet regarding mmWave propagation, particularly inside buildings. So, this article sheds light and analyzes case studies that depict the technical & business impact of skipping this step.
Introduction
Mobile operators always need to deliver greater capacity while keeping minimum financial and technical risks. The cost and network complexity of indoor communications systems, particularly at mmWave bands, is strongly a function of the number of small cells or RF nodes required to achieve the coverage objectives.ย
Outdoor model calibration used to be a standard step for macro network planning and bypassing it causes major deficiencies in coverage. The vital benefits of such a step are well known to planning professionals. Hence, this article gives much attention to indoor networks (while extra readings are available for outdoor concerned people).
Radio propagation in an indoor environment differs greatly from outdoor, not only because of wall losses but also due to many other factors such as close proximity of reflecting structures (walls, floors โฆetc.), introducing different fading profiles, the density of subscribers, mobility of users, etc. And all are resulting in a totally different RF behavior that varies greatly even from one place to another within the same building.ย
Three basic propagation mechanisms; Reflection, Diffraction, and Scattering, influence the propagation of electromagnetic waves. During indoor network planning, RF site measurements should be conducted to examine how these mechanisms aggregate at every venue type. And this is the only method to collect the true information about the structure, examine the effect of wall materials on the signal strength, and reveal any complex propagation mechanisms. Radio design and simulation tools are essential elements during planning. However, they can’t take into calculation all the parameters of each specific environment. In several cases, the financial and technical risks could be significant if this adaptation is ignored. And this gave rise to the need for real CW measurement in order to optimize the infrastructure cost and achieve operator KPI’s as will be explained in detail in this article.
mmWave behaves differentlyย
Initially, let us summarize here the reasons why the indoor environment is getting extremely complex in mmWave. And how it is impacted by various propagation mechanisms, including reflection, scattering, diffraction, and attenuation. Although these factors can be simulated using techniques such as ray-tracing, in practice, they are very sensitive to user inputs and the actual building aspects.ย
Attenuation โย
The higher the frequency, the higher the free space loss. Figure 1 here illustrates the path loss vs. distance for mmWave frequencies compared to sub-6GHz. For example, mmWave coverage at a distance of 200 m, experiences propagation loss around 30 dB above a low band such as 850MHz and around 18 dB compared to 3.5GHz.ย
FSPL vs different bands
Diffraction โย
Diffraction used to play a considerable role in low GHz propagation; however, its effects significantly decay at mmWave bands, as illustrated in figure 2. This means mmWave bands result in higher diffraction losses. And it’s worth mentioning, the diffraction loss would be higher if the receiver is close to the wall of buildings or any other obstructions.ย
Diffraction at low and high bands
Reflection โย
Initial mmWave deployment showed surprising yet promising coverage behavior at some areas due to reflections however, this is unpredictable. Reflection in fact fosters mmWave multipath propagation as in figures 3 & 4 below; the multipath signal due to reflection from a light pole is better than the LOS signal.
TX RX arrangements and NLOS level is higher than LOS in the mmWave case
Scattering โย
At mmWave frequencies, surface roughness impacts wave propagation, causing scattering in non-specular directions that can have a great effect on received signal strength and polarization. Experimental results show that scattering at mmWave frequencies cannot be neglected as a propagation mechanism due to its significant dependence on material surface texture, grazing angle, and frequency.ย
Therefore, optimal designs and successful deployment of high-performance indoor 5G networks require a good understanding of scattering effects resulting from indoor surfaces and objects.ย
Materials lossesย
Different materials commonly used in building construction have a wide diverse of penetration losses. For example, energy-efficient or tinted glass used in modern buildings introduces additional losses that range from 24 to 40 dB compared to low GHz. Materials such as concrete or brick have similar losses that increase rapidly with frequency as per real measurement shown in figure 5. And the propagation of waves into the building will mostly be a mix of paths through different materials.ย
Concrete losses vs Frequency
Outdoor-to-indoor penetrationย
Due to the previous factor of material losses, a signal coming from the macro site will experience magnificent attenuation at mmWave frequencies compared to low GHz bands. This is explained in figure 6 which shows that the typical difference between 1.8 GHz and 3.5 GHz ranges from -10 to -15 dB, while the difference between 3.5 GHz and mmWave bands can be down to -50 dB.ย
Outdoor to indoor mmWave losses vs low GHz
These factors brought into attention that real field testing is getting an essential ingredient to tune the design to every indoor environment at the planned mmWave bands. And lack of this causes colossal business and technical impacts quantified in the next sections.ย
The VIRTUAL and The REALITYย
While leading vendors of indoor planning tools work hardly to make sure materials in their database are as accurate as possible, in fact, the prediction is not always accurate due to the following factors:ย
Database/Reality dissimilaritiesย
Missing inputs
Wrong material selection
Material is not in DBย
Other hidden materials on-siteย
We summarize in this section 2 case studies explaining the effect of field measurements.ย
1) Wall type mix-upย
There are over 70 wall types to choose from. And Many of the wall types look similar by name, while it can be hard, especially for a non-construction RF engineer, to select the correct type. Additionally, custom walls can be defined with varying loss parameters. These custom walls might have similar names but greatly different loss figures.ย
The examples here address a typical case of Drywall and Sheetrock – Light. Most planning engineers consider Drywall and Sheetrock to mean roughly the same thing. The first heatmap below is for the correct value of Drywall to produce the proper passing scenario using 2* 20 W Remotes and 25 Antennas.ย
Instead, if the wall type is mistakenly selected to be Sheetrock Light, the coverage only requires 2* 2 Watt remotes & 12 antennas. And this will result in a fake passing heatmap, as shown in the below figure. If that flawed design is installed, later, the customer will have to either pay a higher price (more than what’s required in the proper case above) or leave a poor-performing system in place.
Wall type Sheet rock-Light (Incorrect Passing)
If we take the previous incorrect design then correct the selection of wall type from Sheet Rock – Light to be the actual Drywall, we will recognize the dramatic impact it has on performance. The figure below shows the actual failing coverage and KPI’s that will take place based on the wrong selected wall type. In other words, the price/performance impacts are extremely out of alignment.ย
Wall type Dry Wall – Correct failing
Worth mentioning, the price increase illustrated above is the baseline -in case the error is recognized before construction works- however, typically, you will realize that in a later phase. Thinking which parameters are correct for a given venue? Accurate predictions require true signal testing (called CW Testing) in various building morphologies, which can then be used to modify prediction parameters. Otherwise, this will eventually lead to a scenario where everybody is blamed!
A scenario where everybody is blamed
2) Inadequate field measurementsย
Sampling a venue should obey some guidelines (Refer to Consultix “mmWave model calibration application note”). And we will address here two mmWave cases comparing the effect of adequate walk testing versus the case when there is no plenty of LOS samples.ย
In the below figure, we examine the calibrated results, which show the same as default results. No improvement was gained because we do not have Line of Sight data. We need a mix of LOS and NLOS data to improve the calibrated model, as shown in the figure afterward.
No LOS data hence no calibration improvement
Below is the case when plenty of LOS and NLOS data were collected. We see significant improvement in calibrated data.
Adequate LOS data hence significant calibration improvement
The Cost of Skipping CW Model Calibration $ย
Post-deployment analysis of several projects showed three typical numbers sorting out coverage and KPI’s deficiencies in the case of prediction-only scenarios and the cases of CW-augmented modeling. This summarizes the financial and technical risks and implications when ignoring to fine-tune propagation models to each specific venue.ย
KPIs – Cost of Skipping CW Model Calibration
Indoor coverage: why is it so criticalย
“80 percent of mobile traffic originates or terminates within a building.”ย
“>70% of commercial buildings & hospitals have insufficient mobile coverage indoors.”ย
“49% of architects see that the cost of provisioning for IBW is the greatest challenge.”
“77% increase in workforce productivity due to better connectivity.”ย
“28% average increase in property’s value in case of reliable indoor coverage.”
“83% of healthcare workers claim poor cellular coverage at least some of the time.”
“40% of warehouse distribution workers blame the carrier when they had a call trouble.”
“32% of cases warehouse distribution workers have to go outside to make calls.”
Founder & CEO of ConsultixWireless and an RF test expert with a track record of developing avant-garde instruments for propagation studies, interference analysis, coverage monitoring and other revolutionary RF test equipment.
Laid the ground for the black-swan electronic system industry in Egypt and has been managing Consultix for 17 years building multi-disciplinary teams to develop, produce and commercialize a remarkable portfolio of more than 15 products serving the global cellular network ecosystem. Amr received his BSc in Electrical Engineering from Ain Shams University.
Twelve major European telecom providers, including Vodafone and Deutsche Telekom, have jointly urged the EU to allocate the full upper 6GHz band (6.425โ7.125 GHz) for mobile use, citing the spectrumโs critical role in future 6G deployment. With the U.S. and China already advancing in this area, operators warn that delays could jeopardize Europeโs digital leadership and hinder next-generation connectivity infrastructure.
Dirty data in data centers undermines everything from AI accuracy to energy efficiency. With poor metadata, data drift, and dark data hoarding driving up costs and emissions, organizations must adopt DataOps, metadata tools, and a strong data culture to reverse the trend. Learn how clean data fuels smarter automation, compliance, and sustainability.
Even the most polished network plans can collapse during deployment due to a hidden gap between design and reality. Traditional planning tools operate in silos and rely on outdated assumptionsโlike accurate GIS data or up-to-date inventory. In todayโs multi-layered networks, thatโs no longer enough. This article explores why static planning falls short, how real-time inventory like VC4โs Service2Create bridges the gap, and what operators need to ensure their rollouts succeed the first time.
The telecom industry in 2025 is undergoing a major transformation, driven by artificial intelligence (AI), cloud growth, next-gen cellular networks, and national data sovereignty. AI is reshaping cellular infrastructure, enhancing spectrum efficiency through innovations like ELAA (Extremely Large Aperture Arrays), and enabling smarter, adaptive networks.
Access to reliable broadband is essential for work, education, and healthcareโbut millions of Americans remain disconnected due to high costs. This article explores how the Universal Service Fund (USF), once focused on phone access, must be modernized to support affordable internet in a digital-first economy. With the expiration of the Affordable Connectivity Program and growing legal uncertainty around USF funding, bold policy reform is urgently needed to close the broadband affordability gap and ensure digital equity.
At THINK 2025, IBM accelerates GenAI adoption with new enterprise-ready toolsโfrom watsonx AI agents to secure LinuxONE infrastructure and hybrid cloud automation. The companyโs latest updates aim to move businesses from GenAI pilots to full-scale deployments with enhanced integration, accuracy, and performance.
Telecom networks are facing unprecedented complexity with 5G, IoT, and cloud services. Traditional service assurance methods are becoming obsolete, making AI-driven, real-time analytics essential for competitive advantage. This independent industry whitepaper explores how DPUs, GPUs, and Generative AI (GenAI) are enabling predictive automation, reducing operational costs, and improving service quality....
Explore the collaboration between Purdue Research Foundation, Purdue University, Ericsson, and Saab at the Aviation Innovation Hub. Discover how private 5G networks, real-time analytics, and sustainable innovations are shaping the "Airport of the Future" for a smarter, safer, and greener aviation industry....
This article explores the deployment of 5G NR Transparent Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTNs), detailing the architecture's advantages and challenges. It highlights how this "bent-pipe" NTN approach integrates ground-based gNodeB components with NGSO satellite constellations to expand global connectivity. Key challenges like moving beam management, interference mitigation, and latency are discussed, underscoring...
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy policy