Private Network Check Readiness - TeckNexus Solutions

Quasi-Earth Fixed Beam vs. Earth-Moving Beams

This article breaks down the core distinctions between Quasi-Earth fixed beams and Earth-moving beams in LEO/MEO satellite networks. It explores their application in both transparent and regenerative NTN architectures, the dynamic association of beams to ground cells, TAC list management, and the implications for UE mobility and network signaling.
Quasi-Earth Fixed Beam vs. Earth-Moving Beams
Image Credit: Radisys

In my previous blog, I explored regenerative non-terrestrial network (NTN) deployment architectures, including both partial and full regenerative systems. The blog discussed NCF considerations for regenerative NTN systems, SWaP and SW architecture considerations, and the challenges of deploying a regenerative NTN architecture.

Quasi-Earth fixed beams vs. Earth-moving beams Explained


For this blog, I would like to discuss Quasi-Earth fixed beams vs. Earth-moving beams, including their differences, impacts, and functionality for network architectures.

First, letโ€™s discuss the 3 types of beams defined:

  • Earth-fixed beams โ€“ these are satellite beams of a geostationary satellite that continue to cover the fixed and same area on the ground. The satellite antenna and the beams are non-steerable, but due to geostationary orbits, the illumination on the ground by the satellite beam(s) remains the same.
  • Quasi-Earth fixed beam โ€“ typically deployed for Non-Geostationary Orbit (NGSO) on Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) satellites with steerable antennae allowing the beam to be steered to cover a fixed geographical area on the ground for the duration of satellite visibility at the location, which typically is for a few minutes.
  • Moving-Earth fixed beam โ€“ typically deployed for NGSO (MEO/LEO) orbit satellites with a non-steerable antenna causing the satellite the beam to sweep over the geographical area on the ground, as the satellite moves, causing the shifting geographical cells on the ground

First, I would like to discuss Quasi-Earth fixed beams and Moving-Earth fixed beams as well as their applications, functionality, and mobility.

Understanding Quasi-Earth Fixed Beams in LEO/MEO Networks

For satellites with steerable antenna capabilities, allowing the beam to be steered to a location on the ground as the satellite moves, enabling the satellite beam to provide coverage to a geographical location for the duration the satellite is over the horizon. This technology is applicable to both transparent and regenerative Systems.

Stationary UEs continue to be served in the same geographical cell through different Satellite beams. The association of a Geographical cell to a Satellite beam changes with time. For the duration of satellite coverage of a geographical cell, the satellite steers its beam to illuminate the same geographical cell. A new satellite beam can also be steered to ensure that it continues to serve the same geographical cell when the previous satellite beam stops serving due to the satellite’s motion.

The association of an on-ground / geographical cell to a satellite beam changes with time for a transparent system wherein the same gNB cell instance always serves a geographical cell. The DU cell instance always broadcasts the same set of TACs.

On the other hand, for a regenerative NTN system, each DU/gNB cell instance association with satellite stays fixed, and therefore the DU/gNB Cell to geographical cell association changes with time, as the satellite moves. The DU/gNB cell instance broadcasts a TAC list that changes with time and satellite motion.

Referring to the figure above:

  • Step 1: The cell is fully under the coverage of the serving satellite and can only be served by it.
  • Step 2: The cell is fully under the coverage of the serving satellite and partially under the coverage of the next satellite. It can only be served by the serving satellite.
  • Step 3: The cell is under complete coverage of both satellites, and any of the satellites can serve it
  • Step 4: The Cell is under the full coverage of only the next satellite and can only be served it by it.

Next, I would like to talk about the Moving-Earth Beam and its applications.

Earth-Moving Beams in Non-Terrestrial Network (NTN) Systems

Moving-Earth Beam For satellites without antenna steering capabilities, the satellite beams are fixed and sweep over the are on the ground as the satellite moves, thus changing the coverage of the geographical area on the ground as the satellite moves.

Moving-Earth Beam is applicable to both transparent and regenerative systems. In this implementation, the list of TACs served by a satellite beam changes incrementally with time, and UEs are associated with beams based on their current location and current coverage of a satellite beam.

For a transparent system, a DU/gNB cell would be associated with a satellite beam and therefore an incrementally changing set of TACs and changing geographical cell coverage on the ground as the beam sweeps, until the satellite moves out of the span of the GW serving the gNB hosting the DU.

On the other hand, for a regenerative NTN system, each DU cell instance associated to a satellite beam stays fixed, and the DU Cell to TAC list association changes incrementally with time, as the satellite moves. DU cell instance broadcasts a TAC list, which changes with time and satellite motion. The incremental change in TACs in these scenarios is managed by a Soft TAC update wherein a new TAC is added a little earlier than removing an old TAC to prevent a UE from performing multiple ping-pong RA updates.

Referring to the figure above:

  • Step 1: Stationary UEs 1, 2, and 3 are under the coverage of SS (Serving Satellite) beam 1
  • Step 2: UEs 1, 2, and 3 are still under the coverage of SS. UEs 1,2 are served by SS Beam 1, while UE 3 is served by SS Beam 2
  • Step 3: UEs 1 and 2 are under the coverage of SS only and served by SS beam 2. UE3 is under the coverage of NS and served by NS beam 1
  • Step 4: UEs 1, 2, and 3 are under the span of both NSs. UEs 1,2 are served by NS Beam 1, while UE 3 is served by NS Beam 2

In this implementation, some of the challenges include service link Switchovers, which involve the change of serving satellite for a stationary UE, taking place over a few seconds. This makes mobility and routing decisions based on UE-reported location difficult. This also increases the overall signaling load in the system.

In my next blog post, I plan to explore beam hopping, including its requirements, applications, and challenges.

 


 

Explore More from the Satellite & NTN Blog Series

Continue your deep dive into the evolving world of Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN) with our dedicated Satellite & NTN series, sponsored by Radisys:

Strengthen Your NTN & Satellite Strategy

  • Gain practical insights on how NTN and satellite connectivity expand IoT, enterprise, and rural broadband reach.
  • Align your roadmap with the latest 3GPP NTN standards, deployment best practices, and emerging multi-orbit investment trends.
  • Access real-world use cases, technical deep dives, and ecosystem partnerships shaping the NTN era.

Access More Radisys Content – Here

Discover More Satellite & NTN Insights – Here


Recent Content

A new joint solution from Rohde & Schwarz (R&S) and the Taiwan Space Agency (TASA) consolidates electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and antenna measurements into a single, production-grade test chamber, signaling a shift in how satellite payloads will be validated for Non-Terrestrial Network (NTN) and mission-critical services. By integrating both disciplines in one chamber, TASA can validate RF performance, emissions, and immunity under consistent test conditions and configurations, improving time-to-launch and de-risking interoperability with terrestrial networks. The TASA deployment combines R&S hardware, software, and engineering with a locally built Compact Antenna Test Range (CATR) reflector to achieve dual-mode EMC and antenna measurements in one chamber.
Tata-owned Nelco has partnered with Eutelsat OneWeb to launch LEO satellite services across India, targeting land, maritime, and aviation sectors. The deal aims to deliver secure, high-speed, low-latency connectivity, support national security, and expand coverage to remote areas. Pending spectrum allocation, Nelco will be ready to offer services once OneWebโ€™s India network goes live.
Reliance Jio has claimed the title of the worldโ€™s largest telecom operator with 488 million subscribers, including 191 million on its 5G network. Despite a 25% tariff hike, Jioโ€™s 5G adoption continues to soar, making up 45% of its total wireless data traffic. Backed by investments in AI, 6G, and satellite internetโ€”plus a partnership with SpaceXโ€™s Starlinkโ€”Jio is expanding its reach beyond India to become a global tech leader.
Indiaโ€™s satellite internet market will focus on enterprise demand over consumer use, according to DoTโ€™s Gulab Chand. With 4G and 5G networks covering most of the country, satellite services are expected to serve sectors like logistics, energy, and mining. Startups and government support are fueling Indiaโ€™s space-tech ecosystem, creating a hybrid terrestrial-satellite network model to power the nationโ€™s digital growth.
At Manchester’s UK Space Conference, I discovered space companies drowning in data while ignoring the AI solutions that could save them. Between dodging aggressive panhandlers and debating whether NVIDIA chips belong in orbit, I learned that “Gas Stations in Space” is brilliant marketing, and why most space executives still think like graduate students.
T-Mobile has expanded its Starlink-powered T-Satellite service to all carriers, offering satellite SMS and location sharing in areas with no cellular coverage. Compatible with over 60 devicesโ€”including newer iPhones, Samsung, and Google Pixel modelsโ€”T-Satellite provides off-grid communication for just $10/month. Learn how to sign up and what features are coming next.
Whitepaper
Telecom networks are facing unprecedented complexity with 5G, IoT, and cloud services. Traditional service assurance methods are becoming obsolete, making AI-driven, real-time analytics essential for competitive advantage. This independent industry whitepaper explores how DPUs, GPUs, and Generative AI (GenAI) are enabling predictive automation, reducing operational costs, and improving service quality....
Whitepaper
Explore the collaboration between Purdue Research Foundation, Purdue University, Ericsson, and Saab at the Aviation Innovation Hub. Discover how private 5G networks, real-time analytics, and sustainable innovations are shaping the "Airport of the Future" for a smarter, safer, and greener aviation industry....
Article & Insights
This article explores the deployment of 5G NR Transparent Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTNs), detailing the architecture's advantages and challenges. It highlights how this "bent-pipe" NTN approach integrates ground-based gNodeB components with NGSO satellite constellations to expand global connectivity. Key challenges like moving beam management, interference mitigation, and latency are discussed, underscoring...

Download Magazine

With Subscription

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Private Network Awards 2025 - TeckNexus
Scroll to Top

Private Network Awards

Recognizing excellence in 5G, LTE, CBRS, and connected industries. Nominate your project and gain industry-wide recognition.
Early Bird Deadline: Sept 5, 2025 | Final Deadline: Sept 30, 2025