Quasi-Earth Fixed Beam vs. Earth-Moving Beams

This article breaks down the core distinctions between Quasi-Earth fixed beams and Earth-moving beams in LEO/MEO satellite networks. It explores their application in both transparent and regenerative NTN architectures, the dynamic association of beams to ground cells, TAC list management, and the implications for UE mobility and network signaling.
Quasi-Earth Fixed Beam vs. Earth-Moving Beams
Image Credit: Radisys

In my previous blog, I explored regenerative non-terrestrial network (NTN) deployment architectures, including both partial and full regenerative systems. The blog discussed NCF considerations for regenerative NTN systems, SWaP and SW architecture considerations, and the challenges of deploying a regenerative NTN architecture.

Quasi-Earth fixed beams vs. Earth-moving beams Explained


For this blog, I would like to discuss Quasi-Earth fixed beams vs. Earth-moving beams, including their differences, impacts, and functionality for network architectures.

First, letโ€™s discuss the 3 types of beams defined:

  • Earth-fixed beams โ€“ these are satellite beams of a geostationary satellite that continue to cover the fixed and same area on the ground. The satellite antenna and the beams are non-steerable, but due to geostationary orbits, the illumination on the ground by the satellite beam(s) remains the same.
  • Quasi-Earth fixed beam โ€“ typically deployed for Non-Geostationary Orbit (NGSO) on Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) satellites with steerable antennae allowing the beam to be steered to cover a fixed geographical area on the ground for the duration of satellite visibility at the location, which typically is for a few minutes.
  • Moving-Earth fixed beam โ€“ typically deployed for NGSO (MEO/LEO) orbit satellites with a non-steerable antenna causing the satellite the beam to sweep over the geographical area on the ground, as the satellite moves, causing the shifting geographical cells on the ground

First, I would like to discuss Quasi-Earth fixed beams and Moving-Earth fixed beams as well as their applications, functionality, and mobility.

Understanding Quasi-Earth Fixed Beams in LEO/MEO Networks

For satellites with steerable antenna capabilities, allowing the beam to be steered to a location on the ground as the satellite moves, enabling the satellite beam to provide coverage to a geographical location for the duration the satellite is over the horizon. This technology is applicable to both transparent and regenerative Systems.

Stationary UEs continue to be served in the same geographical cell through different Satellite beams. The association of a Geographical cell to a Satellite beam changes with time. For the duration of satellite coverage of a geographical cell, the satellite steers its beam to illuminate the same geographical cell. A new satellite beam can also be steered to ensure that it continues to serve the same geographical cell when the previous satellite beam stops serving due to the satellite’s motion.

The association of an on-ground / geographical cell to a satellite beam changes with time for a transparent system wherein the same gNB cell instance always serves a geographical cell. The DU cell instance always broadcasts the same set of TACs.

On the other hand, for a regenerative NTN system, each DU/gNB cell instance association with satellite stays fixed, and therefore the DU/gNB Cell to geographical cell association changes with time, as the satellite moves. The DU/gNB cell instance broadcasts a TAC list that changes with time and satellite motion.

Referring to the figure above:

  • Step 1: The cell is fully under the coverage of the serving satellite and can only be served by it.
  • Step 2: The cell is fully under the coverage of the serving satellite and partially under the coverage of the next satellite. It can only be served by the serving satellite.
  • Step 3: The cell is under complete coverage of both satellites, and any of the satellites can serve it
  • Step 4: The Cell is under the full coverage of only the next satellite and can only be served it by it.

Next, I would like to talk about the Moving-Earth Beam and its applications.

Earth-Moving Beams in Non-Terrestrial Network (NTN) Systems

Moving-Earth Beam For satellites without antenna steering capabilities, the satellite beams are fixed and sweep over the are on the ground as the satellite moves, thus changing the coverage of the geographical area on the ground as the satellite moves.

Moving-Earth Beam is applicable to both transparent and regenerative systems. In this implementation, the list of TACs served by a satellite beam changes incrementally with time, and UEs are associated with beams based on their current location and current coverage of a satellite beam.

For a transparent system, a DU/gNB cell would be associated with a satellite beam and therefore an incrementally changing set of TACs and changing geographical cell coverage on the ground as the beam sweeps, until the satellite moves out of the span of the GW serving the gNB hosting the DU.

On the other hand, for a regenerative NTN system, each DU cell instance associated to a satellite beam stays fixed, and the DU Cell to TAC list association changes incrementally with time, as the satellite moves. DU cell instance broadcasts a TAC list, which changes with time and satellite motion. The incremental change in TACs in these scenarios is managed by a Soft TAC update wherein a new TAC is added a little earlier than removing an old TAC to prevent a UE from performing multiple ping-pong RA updates.

Referring to the figure above:

  • Step 1: Stationary UEs 1, 2, and 3 are under the coverage of SS (Serving Satellite) beam 1
  • Step 2: UEs 1, 2, and 3 are still under the coverage of SS. UEs 1,2 are served by SS Beam 1, while UE 3 is served by SS Beam 2
  • Step 3: UEs 1 and 2 are under the coverage of SS only and served by SS beam 2. UE3 is under the coverage of NS and served by NS beam 1
  • Step 4: UEs 1, 2, and 3 are under the span of both NSs. UEs 1,2 are served by NS Beam 1, while UE 3 is served by NS Beam 2

In this implementation, some of the challenges include service link Switchovers, which involve the change of serving satellite for a stationary UE, taking place over a few seconds. This makes mobility and routing decisions based on UE-reported location difficult. This also increases the overall signaling load in the system.

In my next blog post, I plan to explore beam hopping, including its requirements, applications, and challenges.


Recent Content

The telecom industry in 2025 is undergoing a major transformation, driven by artificial intelligence (AI), cloud growth, next-gen cellular networks, and national data sovereignty. AI is reshaping cellular infrastructure, enhancing spectrum efficiency through innovations like ELAA (Extremely Large Aperture Arrays), and enabling smarter, adaptive networks.
The FCC has launched a formal review to modernize its satellite spectrum sharing rules, addressing outdated EPFD limits and enabling more efficient broadband delivery. The proposed changes target the 10.7-12.7 GHz, 17.3-18.6 GHz, and 19.7-20.2 GHz bands, and follow calls from industry leaders like SpaceX for reforms that support next-generation satellite networks. The initiative is expected to enhance competition and fuel U.S. leadership in space innovation.
Rakuten Mobile and AST SpaceMobile completed Japanโ€™s first satellite video call using unmodified smartphones in April 2025. This test marks a major advancement toward Rakutenโ€™s Saikyo Satellite Service, set to launch in 2026, which will expand mobile coverage across remote and disaster-prone regions using ASTโ€™s LEO satellite network.
In 2025, 5G surpasses 2.25 billion global connections, marking a pivotal shift toward mainstream adoption. While North America leads in performance and per capita usage, challenges in spectrum policy and enterprise integration remain. This in-depth report from 5G Americas explores the rise of Standalone 5G, the promise of 5G-Advanced, the reality of private network deployments, and the need for smart, forward-looking spectrum strategy.
In Beyond Connectivity: The Telco to Techco Transformation, leaders from e&, KDDI, and MTN reveal how telecoms are evolving into technology-first, platform-driven companies. These digital pioneers are integrating AI, 5G, cloud, smart infrastructure, and fintech to unlock massive valueโ€”from AI-powered smart cities in Japan, to inclusive fintech platforms in Africa, and cloud-first enterprise solutions in the Middle East. This piece explores how telcos are reshaping their role in the digital economyโ€”building intelligent, scalable, and people-first tech ecosystems.
In Driving Europeโ€™s Digital Future, telecom leaders Margherita Della Valle (Vodafone), Christel Heydemann (Orange), and Tim Hรถttges (Deutsche Telekom) deliver a unified message: Europe must reform telecom regulation, invest in AI and infrastructure, and scale operations to remain globally competitive. From lagging 5G rollout to emerging AI-at-the-edge opportunities, they urge policymakers to embrace consolidation, cut red tape, and drive fair investment frameworks. Europeโ€™s path to digital sovereignty hinges on bold leadership, collaborative policy, and future-ready infrastructure.
Whitepaper
Telecom networks are facing unprecedented complexity with 5G, IoT, and cloud services. Traditional service assurance methods are becoming obsolete, making AI-driven, real-time analytics essential for competitive advantage. This independent industry whitepaper explores how DPUs, GPUs, and Generative AI (GenAI) are enabling predictive automation, reducing operational costs, and improving service quality....
Whitepaper
Explore the collaboration between Purdue Research Foundation, Purdue University, Ericsson, and Saab at the Aviation Innovation Hub. Discover how private 5G networks, real-time analytics, and sustainable innovations are shaping the "Airport of the Future" for a smarter, safer, and greener aviation industry....
Article & Insights
This article explores the deployment of 5G NR Transparent Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTNs), detailing the architecture's advantages and challenges. It highlights how this "bent-pipe" NTN approach integrates ground-based gNodeB components with NGSO satellite constellations to expand global connectivity. Key challenges like moving beam management, interference mitigation, and latency are discussed, underscoring...

Download Magazine

With Subscription

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Scroll to Top