API

Network APIs expose telecom capabilities — such as quality of service, location, device status, and authentication — to developers and enterprises through standardized programmable interfaces. Industry initiatives including GSMA Open Gateway and the CAMARA project aim to make these capabilities consistent across operators, turning the network into a platform that applications can call directly. For operators, APIs represent a route to revenue beyond connectivity; for enterprises and developers, they offer programmable access to network features once locked inside carrier systems. Standards bodies including TM Forum and 3GPP continue to shape how these interfaces are defined and monetized. This channel tracks network API standards, operator and hyperscaler partnerships, monetization models, and real deployments, with analysis of where programmable networks are gaining commercial traction and where adoption still lags behind the ambition.

TELUS Digital is using Mobile World Congress 2026 to move the AI-in-telecom conversation from pilots to proven production at scale. TELUS Digital reports processing more than two trillion tokens in 2025 through its Fuel iX generative AI platform for TELUS operations and customers. The portfolio spans AI for customer experience, application safety, and network modernization—built and battle-tested within TELUS before client rollout. The Network Design Services practice applies AI to planning and optimization while charting a path from legacy network stacks to cloud-native, automated environments.
Nokia and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are bringing agentic AI to 5G-Advanced network slicing, moving closed‑loop, intent-based services from PowerPoint to live pilots with du and Orange. The partners unveiled an agentic AI-powered slicing solution that fuses Nokia’s RAN-to-core slicing, AirScale radio, and MantaRay SMO with AWS’s Bedrock AI platform and EKS Hybrid Nodes to turn external context—events, traffic, maps, weather—and live network KPIs into real-time policy decisions. The result is adaptive, premium slices provisioned when and where they’re needed, without manual reconfiguration.
OpenAI is reportedly building a portfolio of AI-native devices, signaling a push beyond software and into ambient, multimodal computing that will touch homes, workplaces, and networks. Multiple reports indicate OpenAI has over 200 people developing a family of AI-enabled hardware, with a smart speaker expected to debut first. Early guidance points to a price in the $200–$300 range and a ship window no earlier than February 2027. The device is said to include a camera to capture contextual information about users and surroundings—an explicit bet on multimodal AI that fuses voice, vision, and environment for richer interactions.
The UK government signalled a rapid escalation of online safety measures that will bring AI chatbots squarely under the Online Safety Act and could introduce an under‑16 social media ban as early as this year. Ministers plan to amend the Online Safety Act 2023 so one‑to‑one interactions with AI systems fall within scope of illegal and harmful content controls. The government wants providers of large language model (LLM) assistants and agentic chatbots to implement safety‑by‑design, including stronger filtering, red‑teaming, abuse detection, and rapid takedown procedures for sexualised or otherwise illegal outputs.
SpaceX’s anticipated 2026 IPO is not just a space-launch story; it is a capital and scale inflection that could reorder parts of the mobile and broadband value chain. Market chatter pegs SpaceX’s IPO valuation around the trillion-plus mark with a potential multibillion-dollar primary raise, a war chest that would dwarf most rivals’ balance sheets. For telecom, the same cash advantage accelerates Starlink’s network deployment, ground infrastructure, and device partnerships—compressing the window for incumbents to respond. Starlink reports more than 9,000 satellites in orbit, 9.2 million paying customers, and over $10 billion in annual revenue.
Telefónica and Nokia are piloting agentic AI to make network APIs easier to expose, discover, and consume, aligning with GSMA Open Gateway’s push for interoperable, developer-ready telecom capabilities. Industry efforts like GSMA Open Gateway and CAMARA have raised awareness of standardized network APIs, but uptake hinges on practical tooling that abstracts network complexity while preserving telco-grade security and control. Telefónica and Nokia are now testing agent-to-agent orchestration and context-sharing protocols to let AI “agents” reliably find, chain, and call network functions in a repeatable way.
Anthropic’s latest financing round resets the competitive map for enterprise AI and raises the stakes for telecom, cloud, and large-scale IT buyers planning agentic automation. Anthropic closed a $30 billion Series G at a $380 billion post-money valuation, led by GIC and Coatue with participation from D. E. Shaw Ventures, Dragoneer, Founders Fund, ICONIQ, and MGX, alongside a broad cohort that includes Accel, General Catalyst, Jane Street, and the Qatar Investment Authority. The raise follows sustained commercial momentum and arrives as competitive intensity with OpenAI deepens, signaling that AI platform consolidation and scale economics will define the next phase of the market.
Singapore has confirmed an attempted cyber‑espionage campaign against its national telecom backbone, highlighting a rising class of APT activity aimed at network devices and virtualized cores rather than traditional IT endpoints. Singapore’s Cyber Security Agency (CSA) and Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) disclosed that all four major operators—Singtel, StarHub, M1 and Simba Telecom—were targeted by UNC3886 in incidents last year. The threat actor gained limited access to segments of telco systems and exfiltrated a small volume of network‑related technical data. There was no service disruption, no personal data exposure and, critically, sensitive and segregated systems (including 5G networks) were not compromised.
OpenAI introduced Frontier as an enterprise platform to build, govern, and monitor AI agents—positioning agent management as core infrastructure rather than a feature. Frontier is an end-to-end platform for creating and managing AI agents that can connect to external data and applications, execute tasks, and operate under enterprise controls. OpenAI is emphasizing an open architecture: organizations can manage agents built on Frontier and agents constructed with third-party frameworks.
NGMN’s latest operator-led guidance frames simplification as a precondition for 5G efficiency, sustainability and service agility—not an optional clean-up exercise. NGMN’s new Framework for Network Simplification – An Operator View argues for targeted simplification across radio, core and transport to contain this sprawl while preserving the ability to launch differentiated services. The alliance places cloud‑native design, federated service exposure and AI‑driven operations at the center of that shift, supported by agile ways of working. Simplification is how operators square the circle—cut carbon and cost, while accelerating innovation. The publication offers a practical, non-prescriptive method to decide where simplification delivers the most benefit, and when complexity risk outweighs near-term gains.
The next wave of digital transformation will be defined by AI workloads riding on cloud and edge infrastructure over 5G networks, and that shift will change how networks are built, monetized, and secured. Generative and agentic AI move more compute into the network, creating persistent, uplink-heavy, low-latency flows rather than the mostly downlink, best-effort traffic of the smartphone era. Video from cameras, glasses, and sensors feeds models at the edge and in the cloud; results return in milliseconds to people and machines. That means tighter latency budgets, deterministic jitter control, and stronger guarantees for both throughput and reliability.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is GSMA Open Gateway, and why was it created?
GSMA Open Gateway is an industry-wide initiative, backed by the GSMA, the trade body representing mobile operators globally, and dozens of major carriers, designed to standardize network APIs across operators and countries. Before this initiative, a company wanting to use a SIM swap detection API to prevent account-takeover fraud would typically need separate technical integrations and commercial agreements with every carrier in every market it operated in, an approach that didn’t scale well for global digital businesses like banks or ride-sharing platforms. Open Gateway defines a common technical specification for these APIs so a single integration works consistently across participating operators worldwide, dramatically reducing the engineering and business development overhead for any company wanting to build services on top of carrier network data.
Why do telecom companies want to expose network APIs to outside developers?
Exposing network APIs gives carriers a new revenue stream that doesn’t depend on selling more raw data or voice minutes, an increasingly commoditized, low-margin business. Instead, operators can charge for premium, differentiated capabilities, like verified caller identity for fraud prevention, real-time network quality guarantees for a specific application, or device location data for logistics and delivery tracking, turning the network itself into a monetizable platform. This mirrors a broader strategic shift across the industry, often summarized as moving from selling bandwidth to selling outcomes, where operators position themselves as infrastructure partners for other industries’ digital products rather than purely as connectivity providers competing on price. It also opens partnerships with software companies that wouldn’t otherwise have a direct commercial relationship with an operator at all.
What are some real-world examples of telecom network APIs in use today?
Some of the most established use cases include number verification, used heavily by banking and fintech apps to confirm a user genuinely controls the phone number tied to their account before allowing a transaction; SIM swap detection, which flags when a phone number has recently been transferred to a new SIM, a common signal of an account-takeover attempt; and location APIs, used by logistics and delivery companies for real-time tracking, or by other services for geofencing-based features. Newer, more specialized examples are emerging too, including quality-on-demand APIs that let an application request guaranteed network performance for a specific session, useful for video calls or cloud gaming, effectively giving developers programmatic access to capabilities like network slicing without negotiating a direct deal with the underlying carrier.
How do network APIs relate to network slicing and monetization?
Network slicing creates the actual underlying capability, a dedicated, performance-guaranteed virtual network for a specific purpose, while network APIs are often the mechanism by which a third-party developer actually requests and uses that capability programmatically, without needing to understand or manage the underlying slicing infrastructure directly. A quality-on-demand API, for example, might let a video conferencing app request guaranteed low latency for an important call, with that request fulfilled behind the scenes by the operator’s slicing infrastructure. This pairing is central to how operators are trying to monetize their 5G Standalone investments: slicing creates differentiated network capabilities, and APIs are the commercial and technical interface that makes those capabilities accessible and billable to outside developers.
What’s stopping network APIs from being adopted faster?
Adoption has been slower than initial industry enthusiasm suggested, for a few recurring reasons. Developers building global products need consistent behavior across operators and countries, and while standardization initiatives like Open Gateway aim to solve this, achieving true consistency across dozens of carriers, each with their own legacy systems and commercial priorities, takes time. There’s also a chicken-and-egg dynamic: developers are hesitant to build products around APIs that aren’t yet universally available, while operators are cautious about investing heavily in API infrastructure without proven developer demand. Pricing adds another layer of friction, since operators are still experimenting with how to price access in a way that’s attractive to developers while still generating meaningful revenue relative to infrastructure cost.
Who are the typical customers building on top of telecom network APIs?
Customers span a range of industries, but financial services and fraud prevention have been the earliest and most consistent adopters, using number verification and SIM swap detection to reduce account-takeover and transaction fraud. Logistics, delivery, and ride-sharing companies are major users of location-based APIs for real-time tracking and route optimization. Gaming and entertainment companies are increasingly interested in quality-on-demand APIs to guarantee performance for latency-sensitive applications like cloud gaming. Beyond individual companies, aggregator platforms have emerged specifically to combine APIs from multiple operators into a single access point, letting developers integrate once and reach users across many carriers and countries without managing separate relationships with each one.
Are network APIs secure, and who controls access to sensitive data like location?
Security and access control are central design considerations for network APIs, given the sensitive nature of data like location or SIM status. Access is generally tightly controlled through authentication and authorization systems, and most operators only expose specific, limited capabilities through these APIs rather than raw access to underlying network or subscriber data. Consent mechanisms are also typically built in, particularly for anything involving an individual’s location or personal data, often requiring an explicit user opt-in before that data can be shared with a third-party application. This remains an evolving area, and as more operators expose more capabilities through these interfaces, regulators and privacy advocates are paying closer attention to how consent is obtained across different countries with different privacy law standards.

Partner Hubs

Download content, access intelligence tools, and hear from executives.

Partner Events

  • M360 ASEAN
  • FutureNet Asia 2026
  • Network X Vienna 2026
Scroll to Top